 |
MYTHOLOGY
From Merriam-Webster:
Main Entry: my·thol·o·gy
Pronunciation: mi-'thä-l&-jE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -gies
Etymology: French or Late Latin; French mythologie, from Late Latin mythologia
interpretation of myths, from Greek, legend, myth, from mythologein to
relate myths, from mythos + logos
1 : an allegorical narrative
2 : a body of myths : as a : the myths dealing
with the gods, demigods, and legendary heroes of a particular people b :
MYTHOS 2 <cold war mythology>
3 : a branch of knowledge that deals with myth
4 : a popular belief or assumption that has grown up around someone or
something
Between writing my first book and today, the Internet did the equivalent of the
Big Bang, and the World Wide Web expanded into the Ubiquitous Uncontrollable
Universe. As a result, certain factual errors about me began to circulate and
became part of my unofficial biography now often used by students,
interviewers, and university public relations staff before I come to give a
talk.
At first, there were only minor mistakes, for example, that I had received my
Master’s Degree and a Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, which is a fine school and one
that I did attend while studying for my doctorate. But the only doctorates I
have today are honorary ones, and according to one university president who
handed me one, this entitles me to a free parking space in the faculty lot but
only when I come to give a free talk . To set the record straight, I never
finished my doctoral program, and my B.A. and M.A. degrees came from San Jose
State University.
As the Internet became more widespread so did the errors. They are not quite
urban legend strength, but they have definitely been magnified. I remember the
day I saw it announced on a live online interview: Amy Tan is the winner of the
Nobel Prize in Literature. It then occurred to me that one could actually
conduct several lives of different realities, even better ones, certainly with
more prestigious prizes. But as the online interview began, I typed in my
greeting: "Hi, Amy Tan here, only I never did win that Nobel Prize. Wish I had.
Thanks for the vote of confidence."
Most often I am aware of the mistakes when I am receiving other honors having to
do with being Asian American or a writer or Chinese or an alumna of one of the
collages I attended. There I learn of all the other prizes I have supposedly
won, among them, the National Book Award, the Los Angeles Time Book Prize, and
the Pulitzer. I was indeed nominated for the first two, so a little
exaggeration there is understandable, but the Pulitzer reference is a fluke
from the web, and one that keeps replicating like a virus. It’s embarrassing to
start my acceptance speeches with a list of errata, which then seems to only
show how truly unworthy I am to be standing before the podium holding the
engraved crystal statue.
Some of the mistakes are maddening, like the Los Angeles Times piece that
came out in 2000, which I did not read, but which a friend felt it his duty to
read aloud to me for my own edification; it described me as having a big smile
that displayed teeth discolored by my nicotine habit. Obviously, the reporter
must have looked up that old Salon interview in which I was
surreptitiously smoking on my terrace and asked the reporter to please not
mention this. Whatever the source, I never realized my teeth looked that bad,
and if they are indeed discolored enough to be worth mentioning, I must make it
known that it is not due to cigarettes. I am proud of the fact that I gave up
smoking for good in 1995, and since then I have actually brushed my teeth from
time to time and have gone for routine professional teeth cleaning every six
months.
Inaccuracy, I fear, has become epidemic among publications whose writers rely
upon the Internet for research. For there, all past interviews and articles
survive and even thrive, as if they were fresh off the press, perpetually part
of today’s news. Thus, an interview that had been done in 1989 said I had been
married for fifteen years. A reporter, who obviously used this interview as
background, reported in 1996 that I had been married for fifteen years. Some
reporters in wishing to differentiate between the first fifteen years and the
last have referred to Lou as my "current husband."
Having a twenty-year-old photograph run with the articles also causes me
consternation. I have had p.r. people at events refuse to take me to the green
room before my event, as I requested, only to have them later rush up to me and
say, "Oh, I’m so sorry. I didn’t know you were the Amy Tan. I was
looking for someone else." Read between the lines.
I did a bit of sleuthing the other day to see who exactly is this Amy Tan who
looks perpetually the same as in 1989, has been married to multiple husbands
but for the same number of years, and has won all the literary prizes on earth.
I found her lurking in at least one den of iniquity. This website opened with
the following come-on:
"Do you need a quality paper on Amy Tan today, tomorrow, next week, or next
month?
Since 1997, our experts on Amy Tan have helped students worldwide by providing
the best, lowest-priced writing service on the Internet. If you've waited
too long to start your paper on Amy Tan, or have more writing than you can
handle, we can help. Our staff of over 200 professional writers located
around the world has produced thousands of college term papers, essays,
research papers, dissertations, theses, and book reports on all topics
involving Amy Tan. These excellent papers are available to you instantly
for only $25.99 each."
How dismal to think I can be instantly summed up for only $25.99. They could
not possibly be correct. After all, I’ve paid psychiatrists $200 for fifty
minutes many times over, and I still don’t understand who I am.
For years, I have felt stymied by my alternative reality. It created a new kind
of existential angst. Who was I really if not what all these articles say I am?
If the Internet and its share of misinformation went on in perpetuity, then I,
too, would live on in immortal muddle. The real me would become lost to
misstatements of fact.
Then I realized I could use the same methods by which the errata grew to quash
them, all 48,291 hits. I decided to write this piece, the one right before your
very eyes. This piece would then become part of the Internet Archives Used by
Reporters, and thus I would at least have recorded my rebuttal for posterity.
So herewith are the facts, as put forth by the ultimate expert, Amy Tan, and you
don’t have to pay $25.95 to get the scoop on what in her life is only a
mistake.
Erratum 1: Tan's works do not include The Year of No Flood, 1995. That
was a chapter in her novel The Hundred Secret Senses. At one time, Tan
thought she might write a book with that title that would include the flood and
then the drought that preceded the Boxer Uprising, but because she blabbed
about that book so much before it was written, it ejected itself from her
imagination. It is apparent that someone to whom she blabbed assumed she
finished the novel and published it.
Erratum 2: Tan did not attend eight different colleges. It was five, she says,
and that number was excessive enough, particularly when the fundraising season
rolls around each year and she is asked to contribute to the coffers of her
alma maters.
Erratum 3: Tan did not teach poetry at a university in West Virginia. She has no
idea where that came from, because she has never been to West Virginia and she
has never taught. But the idea is rather flattering and she has always wished
she could write poetry let alone teach it. Along those same lines, Tan has
never been a workshop leader of a writers group, and as to those who claim to
her agent and editor that she led their group, that was Molly Giles who was the
leader. She has red hair. Tan has red hair only when she performs in a literary
garage band called the Rock Bottom Remainders. While playing in the band,
however, she has never both worn the red wig and led a writers workshop.
Erratum 4: Tan never worked in a factory alongside a certain person who was your
best friend, not in this life or in a past life that she can remember. Among
Tan’s early jobs, she worked as a switchboard operator at her high school, as a
carhop for A&W Root Beer, and at Round Table Pizza, slinging pizzas.
Erratum 5: Tan has never lived in a mansion in the multimillionaired hills of
Hillborough, California. She went to a fundraiser there once where guests were
asked to shell out $25,000 to help a political candidate, but somehow they let
Tan in for free; the political candidate lost. As to where Tan lives, that
would be a more modest condominuium in San Francisco, a town which has some
pretty nice hills itself and a mix of billionaires and poor, both of whom the
political candidates profess to have in their camp.
Erratum 6: Tan’s condominium is not the top floor of a former mansion. Her
building was constructed in 1916 as apartments. Her unit, is on the third and
fourth floor, the fourth being a former attic. Tan, no spring chicken having
been born in 1952 (to determine accurate age, take today’s year and subtract
1952), now wishes she had an elevator.
Erratum 7: Tan has never had a fight with her publisher in a bookstore, nor did
she scream and fling books around, causing other patrons to run for their
lives. Tan claims her publisher and she have always had an amicable
relationship, and the only time they fight is over the bill at a restaurant,
but only as an ostentatious show of politeness. But most times, Tan lets her
publishers win. They pay the bill.
Erratum 8: With the exception of restaurant bills, Tan has never had a fight
with her agent, Sandra Dijkstra, and switched to a new agent. Tan’s agent was
the one who encouraged her to write fiction early on. She is like a Jewish
mother who badgered Tan week after to week to keep writing. Tan owes her life
to her agent for giving her the life of a writer. For that reason, Tan probably
also owes her lunch, but Sandy usually pays anyway.
Erratum 9: Lou DeMattei is indeed Tan’s first husband. He is also her current
husband. In addition, he is her only husband. They have been together since
1970, married since 1974. To discover how many total years that is, take
today’s year and subtract from it 1970 for togetherness or 1974 for marriage.
Erratum10: Tan does not have two children, unless you consider, as she does,
that her dogs are her children. In articles about Tan written after 1997, Tan’s
cat, Sagwa, should not be referred to as her pet but as her late and dearly
beloved kitty. Tan acknowledges she has included children in most of her books,
except the one about the cat. Predictably, these children have grown older with
each subsequent book. Though they are imaginary, she is terribly fond of them.
But she has never done homework with them every night, taken them to soccer and
swim meets, cried in an emergency room when it turned out they had only stuck
beans in their ears, or gone through the cycle of being angry, then worried,
then hysterical when they drove off to a forbidden place and then went missing
for six hours. Thus, Tan cannot say with real conviction that her dogs are her
children.
Erratum 11: Tan does not have yellow skin as depicted in a cartoon version of
Amy Tan in The Simpsons. It is yellow skin depictions like these that make Tan
slightly uncomfortable in being called a Writer of Color. Also, Tan did not
really berate Lisa Simpson and humiliate her mercilessly in front of a TV
audience. Those words were put in Tan’s mouth by another cartoon character,
namely Matt Groening. Other than the skin color thing, she thinks Matt Groening
is a sweetheart and pretty nice guy. She once argued with him in public over
the lunch bill, but he pushed her credit card aside and paid.
That’s it for now. I will be adding to this regularly, as needed. Look for
installments in 48,291 websites and growing listed by Google for "Amy Tan."
This piece was published in The Opposite of Fate under the title "Persona
Errata."
|
 |